Supranational society: Masterlist of 1,300 NGOs and the top 400 people in them

"The friendship Nancy and I shared with Kay Graham is one of the legacies of my government service that we cherish most. ... The Kay of the permanent establishment never lost sight of the fact that societies thrive not by the victories of their factions but by their ultimate reconciliations. Kay and I met in 1969 at the home of Joe Alsop, another member of Washington's permanent establishment."

"[Think tanks] exert definite and even considerable influence on the process of elaborating and making political decisions. It is connected with the fact that ... leaders of such centers have as a rule personal close links with the [government]. Second, the centers are created in order to prepare and adopt the major political decisions in the shade, far from public. Third, such analytical and expert centers really accumulate the best intellectual forces of the country and fourth, not always but rather often, the centers were founded simply to provide jobs to [retired] politicians."

Note: The names of institutes and individuals on this page have been gathered over the course of hundreds of hours from books, newspapers, official websites (don't forget Webarchive), regular websites (names were always double checked), a number of membership lists, and the Who's Who. ISGP's membership/biography lists related to the Pilgrims, the 1001, the American Security Council, Le Cercle and other groups were used as a starting point to find all these private groups. Many sources can be found in those lists or in various articles on this website, but certainly not all - and unfortunately there's no time to include all the sources here. This page has primarily been put together to make cross referencing a hundred times easier than before.

People studying political science should have a good idea of the non-government organizations listed on this page. They vary considerable in purpose and influence, but are an integral part of the globalization process, as well as intelligence and covert operations. For an explanation of the establishments termed "Liberal", "Conservative", "Zionist" and "Vatican-Paneuropa", in which these groups are largely divided, the reader can visit the introduction page.

The names of these groups/NGOs have been collected by the author of this site over the course of eight to nine years. All really low level institutes have been left out - there are probably over a 1000 more filled with names nobody knows and which really have no influence.

What keeps this entire network afloat are funds from corporations, foundations, membership fees, fund raisers and occasional government grants is. Ban the foundations, curb corporate contributions, and the whole network will start to fall apart. I'm not necessarily saying that this is a solution.

Interestingly, back in early 2004 this author was unable to find more than six or seven of the more important organizations below on one website or in one book, even after looking for it all over the place. Often groups like the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission were mixed in with the "Illuminati", the "Freemasons" and the "New World Order". Tiny bits of information on such groups as the Pilgrims, Le Cercle, the 1001 Club, the JASON Group, the Sun Valley Meetings and others were scattered all over the place and often not freely accessible. Information on mainland Europe with regard to these kind of groups was especially scarce. And in all cases no one had a clue how various groups related to each other. As the reader can see, things have changed. A lot!

Below the reader can find names of prominent individuals ranked according to the number of private groups and a number of key corporations that they have (certainly) been involved with (maintained here). Overall it appears to be a very accurate influence index when it comes to, once and for all, and in rather scientific manner, identifying the "powers-that-be". Certainly it identifies all the key players in the liberal (globalist), conservative (defense), Catholic conservative (Opus Dei/SMOM), Zionist, and to a large degree even the Russian establishments. As the reader will soon realize, most of these people know one another very well. Anyone with an interest in globalization or parapolitical issues would do well to become familar with these individuals.

It's possible to check the rankings for yourself by doing searches on this page for particular (sur)names. Ideally sources would be available with all the groups and names listed, but that just takes too much time at this point. Many names should be easy to verify through the sources just mentioned. Many names should be easy to verify through the sources just mentioned. About 330 still alive persons are listed at this point, but it's not too hard to add another few dozen "helpers" that have been involved in less than 10 NGOs.

The above colors have been used to give an indication of each person's professional background. The reader can count all the think tanks, foundations, and other NGOs each person in this list is involved in by going through ISGP's NGO list.