The Basics of Supranational Politics: NGOs, Superclass Index, Four-Establishment Model and Box Models

By: Joël van der Reijden | Date: November 9, 2013 | Updated: Dec. 22, 2023. | BEING REWRITTEN

1. The "Standard Model" of politics
2. Where the "Standard Model" breaks down: anything conspiracy
3. The "Globalist Model" to replace the "Standard Model"
4. "Three Establishment" and "Boxes" models as subsets of the "Globalist Model"
   
   APPENDICES
5. The menace of conspiracy disinformation


6. Notes

"[Congressman] Jan de Wit aksed me to answer your question. [Our party] is focused on formal political relations … With your question we enter the extra-parliamentary domain of parapolitics; informal, non-public organizations in which influence-forming is practiced, often by persons in influential government positions and/or from the corporate world who together make political decisions without oversight. ...

"Too little concrete information is available about [Le Cercle and hundreds of] other organizations besides Bilderberg to be used in parliamentary sessions. ... As far as I know, the topic [of Bilderberg] has never been discussed in the past 8.5 years [that I've been here in congress]."

~ Oct. 11 and 19, 2010 emails to this author from G. van Leemput, a foreign affairs and defense aide to Dutch Socialist Party Senator (1995-1998) and Congressman (1998-2014) Jan de Wit.

"One-third of modern history is still classified [in national security vaults] ... [An] intelligence officer turned art teacher ... displayed a color slide of an abstract sculpture. The piece was over six feet tall, of metal branches all intertwined... It was, to all appearances, a random column of ugliness. Hardly the model for a book. "Don't look at the sculpture itself," our friend advised. "Look at the holes." Inside the twisted sculpture was an orderly pattern of smooth ovals, arranged in perfect balance, making sense of the whole...

"Known history is like the visible surface of the sculpture, a series of harsh, twisted, seemingly unconnected branches. The hidden parts of history, the covert sides, are more orderly and rational, but can be seen and understood only if you are told where to look. The holes in history are what makes sense of the thing; the hidden motives, secret agendas, classified purposes..."

~ John Loftus ¹, president and key founder of the Mossad-, CIA- and MI6-riddled hard-right Intelligence Summit and Jerusalem Summit, together with controversial Mossad-tied Russian-Jewish oligarch Mikhail Cherney.

Loftus once held some of the highest security clearances in the U.S. and NATO and is often considered a respectable author. However, nothing is ever as it seems, as is being implied by his own metaphor. Even he himself is not at all who he often pretends to be.

The "Standard Model" of politics

There are different ways to look at the world when it comes to politics. In western countries we tend to look at the various political parties, the elected heads of state, the ministers and their interactions with parliament and the public. We shouldn't forget the role of the media, which actually serves a purpose besides entertainment: its most important function is to act as a fourth pillar to the Trias Politica, a reference to the separation of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches in many western governments. The media's primary role are to help act as a guardian to the democratic process. If the government has been corrupted, or outside forces try to influence the democratic process in any unfair way, the idea is that there are always untainted media outlets that can investigate and inform the public about it.

After the internal political makeup of a country has been analyzed, including the fact whether or not it has a free media and fair elections, it is generally time to look at the country's external relations. Every country on the planet maintains political, economic and military relationships with other countries. These relations can be good, bad or anything in between. Over the course of the 20th century, and especially since the end of World War II, these one-on-one or small-circle relations have increasingly been replaced by international institutes where many countries are represented at the same time. Well known examples of these international institutes include the United Nations, the European Union, NATO and the G8 meetings. Specifically on the economic front there are the World Bank, the IMF, the OECD and the World Trade Organization. Through all these organizations countries in the West and around the world try to work out their political, military and economic issues.

Where the "Standard Model" breaks down: anything conspiracy

However, sometimes events happen in Western countries that cannot be explained by this "Standard Model". In fact, to someone who is knowledgable or simply pays attention, anomalies to the "Standard Model" can be spotted in the media and in politics every hour of every day. If pointed out, these "anomalies" are usually referred to as (unproven) "conspiracies", or "conspiracy theories".

When we look at "anomalies" that certainly this author has studied well, it is possible to present quite a long list of these that do not fit in the "Standard Model" of politics. If we want to keep the largest amount of readers (relatively) comfortable, we can single out a "first tier" of conspiracies. These actually are so obvious and well-documented, at least on ISGP, there's really no need to call them "theories". We can just refer to them as very obvious "conspiracies":

Realistically, we could mention many other conspiracies that would take additional studying for people to become comfortable with:

Even this author's personal experiences are set outside the "Standard Model" for politics:

The "Globalist Model" to replace the "Standard Model"

Clearly the "Standard Model" for politics isn't enough. Arguably it isn't even suited for teaching at elementary schools, certainly not without any context. It's just too much of a fairytale. A much more accurate, complete model is the "Globalist Model".

This model, in a general sense, by no means is unique to ISGP. From the John Birch Society and the conspiracy Nazis of the Liberty Lobby during the Cold War, to the "alt right" of the 21st century, they all attack "the globalists". There's a caveat though: these groups, which used to be kept out of the mainstream media, have always mixed their "anti-globalism" with heavy duty conspiracy disinformation that ensures they remain "fringe". That disinformation involves anything from "globalism" = "socialism" = "communism" rhetoric, with nationalistic Christian fascism essentially being touted as the only solution; to "chemtrails", Holocaust denial, 9/11 pod and no-plane theories, or interdimensional lizards. This eternal menace of conspiracy disinformation, and the billions poured into it annually, is discussed in a separate section here, because it is absolutely key for new readers to understand.

Over the course of more than 20 years, ISGP's definitions for its "Globalist Model" have been reached completely independent of this conspiracy disinformation circus. There's some overlap, but also considerable differences, expansions and attention to detail. This is how ISGP defines the "Globalist Movement":

1. Pre-WWII the Morgans and Rockefellers, along with other "robber baron" names as Carnegie and Mellon, were the key players that "the globalist establishment" revolved around - known to insiders as "the Internationalists".


2. After WWII only the Rockefellers remained, their primary power base being an increasingly large network of think tanks, with the strongly overlapping membership of the CFR (1921-), Bilderberg (1954-) and Trilateral Commission (1973-) traditionally at the core. Key allies on "the left" and "the right" have included Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, George Shultz and, eventually, George Soros.


3. It is a multinational-funded supranational network of think tanks and conferences that always seeks to control - and in practice controls - the media, publishing houses, music labels, Hollywood studios, search engines, politics, activism and any "free speech zone" within individual countries. With "free speech zones" think about forums, news site comment sections, podcasts, or "potentially problematic" community centers surrounding typical "male activitiy": hard rock music, the military, police, guns, conspiracy, etc.


4. It established and controls the basic supranational structures of the EU, G8, NATO, WTO, and United Nations.


5. It operates much more as a tightly-organized security agency than a mere "business lobby".


6. It has had the long-standing habit of privatizing and "outsourcing" intelligence operations in order to take away controversy: from the pre-WWII "Room" and Walrus Club; to the "liberal CIA" Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie and other foundations in the early 1960s ², to the network of the National Endowment for Democracy network since the early 1980s working with its Republican and Democrat counterparts. And more. Much more.


7. Through media control in each country it controls which political candidates - in at least 3 tiers - the masses can become aware of, and thus, possibly, can vote on. The 3 tiers are: mainstream, semi-mainstream anti-establishment ("liberal CIA" / social democrats in the U.S.), and fully anti-establishment activist and/or conspiracy theorist.


8. It is purposely juggling the masses in each country between "the left" and "the right" through sponsored politicians and pundits in the media, podcast sphere, and social media.


9. It controls all conspiracy (disinformation) outlets.


10. Its policies - from Third World immigration and white guilt, to feminism, to climate change action - have been determined at least half a century before they become "all-encompassing" in the media.


11. It is as forceful and propagandist as it thinks it can get away with, using all media, political and activist avenues it has at its deposal - implementing it as if its a life-or-death struggle, without ever backing down.

"Three Establishment" and "Boxes" models as subsets of the "Globalist Model"

This site has essentially been dedicated to proving this central "Globalist Model". It has several sub-models, such as the:

1. Three or Four Establishment Model
2. Boxes Model for conspiracy and politics.

The first is an analysis of the 2,000 NGOs that ISGP uniquely collected over a period of 20 years and counting. ISGP's "Superclass Index" is based on it as well. You can distinguish two main forces within this elite think tank network:

1. Liberal-globalist
2. Conservative-nationalist

Although the total number of elite networks, at least during the Cold War, included three different, cooperating flavors of conservatism, with the Vatican-Paneuropa Network largely being defunct today:

Liberal-globalist
1. Liberal-globalist
   
   
   Conservative
2. Conservative-nationalist in the U.S.
3. Vatican-Paneuropa Network
4. Zionist

ISGP's Boxes Model looks at the liberal-globalist and conservative-nationalist establishment not just from an elite think tank perspective, but from a 3-tier controlled opposition perspective with a bit of addional horizontal spacing. The model below is focused on the United States, but with minor adaptions it also is surprisingly accurate in European politics, where green, labor and socialist parties (read: "antifa", and maybe "liberal CIA" if such funding sources can be unearthed) are very common:

The "alt right" in particular in labeled "conservative CIA" by ISGP since 2019.

The controlled-opposition aspect is absolutely key, because the very nature of the "globalist movement" is deception. It operates through layer after layer of misdirection, often in very subtle yet very effective ways.

The Boxes Model for conspiracy theory is a qood example: the idea is you eiter believe the official version of events, or a pressured into following some nutty conspiracy guru. And even if you stand your ground (eventually) and refuse to follow the conspiuracy guru, the idea is that you are always forced onto the defense by people areound you who *assume* you follow the theories of one of these nutty gurus they've seen on television or on social media. Real world experience of this author: "There are plenty of questions surrounding 9/11." "What?! Haha! You believe that there was a conspiracy?! You believe that there were no planes?!" The Boxes Model article talks about this in more detail.

A less contentious way to quickly demonstrate the daily dose of misdirection from the Globalist Movement might be the oversight from the Boxes Model related to Third World immigration.

As many historical polls reveal, and ethnic crime and ethnic IQ numbers quickly explain, the Third World immigration agenda has always been opposed by 70 to arguably over 90 percent of the white masses, not to mention sometimes half of the immigrant groups already here. If "democracy" represents the top-down will of the people that influences the creation of political parties and policies of politians, then certainly this aspect crushes the idea that westerners live in such a political system. Third World immigration always kept going strong, with politicians and the media - under the rather obvious control of elites surrounding the CFR, Bilderberg and Trilateral Commission - increasingly heavily engaging in full blown psychological warfare to keep their own people from rising up. That psywar includes:

1. Very sweeping, no-middle ground "anti-rascism / everybody is equal"-laws.
2. The hiding of ethnic crime and IQ numbers.
3. Banning Koran burnings by law.
4. "You do not love" and "whites need to repent for colonialist past" propaganda.
5. Pouring billions into Black Lives Matter and hundreds of "independent", grassroots" pro-immigration protest groups.
6. No talk for decades of a need to up the *white* birth numbers, and never explaining that population growth is driven by Africa in particular.

Despite all that, one would think that especially in Europe, liberal-socialist parties would emerge that ALSO oppose Third World immigration - and do so in a rational, practical and moral manner. However, that has never happened, in any western country. All we get the the "conservative CIA" freakshow involving stigmatizing comments, fascist ideas, neoliberalism, libertarianism, anti-nature measures, global warming denial, Covid deadliness denial and more of that ilk.

This makes zero sense, of course, and is one of many anomalies that we see with the "Standard Model" of politics. Within the "Globalist Model" though, it is perfectly obvious why this is the case, as relentless Third World immigration is the number 1 most important agenda of the "globalist movement".

*****

Note: On August 8, 2023 the intro article was cut off here in preparation for a much more updated version. The sections on ISGP's three establishment model and its boxes model has been separated and expanded. So is the section discussing all the elite ties of all past U.S. presidential administrations.

APPENDICES

The menace of conspiracy disinformation

Going through the above sections and the various links in them, one conclusion we have to draw is that conspiracy is real, and with that that the "Standard Model" of politics is inadequate. Another conclusion we have to draw is that certain conspiracies people really should have no fear of speaking out about, even though the "powers that be" make this as uncomfortable as possible. What should we be talking about? Well, the following:

1. Rockefeller
2. CFR
3. Bilderberg
4. Trilateral Commission
5. Other "globalist" NGOs
6. The "globalist movement"
7. CIA coups
8. Big business CIA coups
9. Race and crime
10. Race and IQ
11. Anti-immigration polls
12. George Soros
13. "Liberal CIA" and antifa
14. "Conservative CIA"
15. Controlled opposition in politics
16. Conspiracy disinformation
17. Big business Nazi-funding
18. 9/11
19. The JFK assassination
20. United Nations

Everything has a time and a place, but these are all very genuine conspiracies that need light shined onto them. At the same time, it is important to denounce conspiracy disinformation. The following are key examples of that:

1. Holocaust denial or "revisionism".
2. Anti-vaccine propaganda
3. Ancient aliens
4. Alien abductions
5. The Anunnaki
6. Planet X and Nibiru
7. Atlantis
8. Great Pyramid 10,000 years old
9. Chemtrails
10. Fake moon landings
11. Flat earth
12. 9/11 no-plane theories
13. 9/11 basement bombs
14. 9/11 pod theories
15. Modern Illuminati
16. "Illumninati bloodlines"
17. Most ritual child abuse
18. More than 2 shooters with JFK
19. A second shooter with RFK

ISGP has a whole page dedicated to genuine and fake conspiracy theory, where more details can be found. The point here is that conspiracy disinformation is one of the biggest problems of our era. Looking at America's "right" in this regard, this has been going since at least the pro-Nazi Liberty Lobby and Christian right John Birch Society. The Liberty Lobby would embrace Holocaust denial, and together with the John Birch Society would equate the "liberal Eastern Establishment" and "socialism" with "communism". They would also never dig overly deep into the globalist movement, as evidenced, for example, by John Birch Society author Gary Allen never writing more than one sentence about the Pilgrims Society.

However, despite all their little distractions and superficialities, both groups did consistently point fingers at the Rockefellers, Henry Kissinger, CFR, Bilderberg and Trilateral Commission. Even pointing fingers to its great enemy, the (Rockefeller-founded) United Nations, is useful, considering decades later more and more people are discovering that this is the biggest antifa institute on the planet, with way too much support for anything from Fidel Castro to Iran's Ayatollahs and Palestinian terrorist groups. Hence, if you were able to ignore mind-numbing discussions between Liberty Lobby and John Birch Society veterans as, "Is the "New World Order" controlled by "the Jews" or "the communist globalists?", you could actually learn something about the West's supranational structures.

Contrast that to social media networks of the 2020s: theories surrounding chemtrails, flat earth, alien vehicle crashes, ancient aliens, and "alien lasers caused the 2023 Maui fires" dominate the conspiracy sections of various platforms, with some videos having tens of millions of views. Covid "hoax", "gender wars" and Third World immigration-type videos are even more prominent. Discussions on the Rockefeller influence, CFR, Trilateral Commission, etc. has been pushed to the background by all of it. Meanwhile, the work of this author has been buried into the deepest abyss by Google and social media.

Quite a bit of today's conspiracy disinformation originates from a network of alternative little think tanks, the only prestigious one being SRI, where Uri Gelkler was "tested" and the infamous Project Stargate remote viewing project took place. The network:

• Edgar Cayce Foundation: 1931-.
• Stanford Research Institute / SRI: 1946-.
• Round Table Foundation: 1948-1958.
• Foundation / Institute for the Study of Consciousness: 1952-.
• Esalen Institute: 1962-.
• Institute for Noetic Sciences: 1973-

Quite a few people active at these institutes would end up on the 1988-founded Art Bell / Coast to Coast AM new age conspiracy disinformation radio show, which at its peak in 1997 was syndicated on over 500 radio stations and claimed up to 15 million listeners nightly. George Noory became the dominant host of Coast to Coast AM in 2003 and brought a distinct John Birch Society conviction with him with regard to conspiracy. In 2004 Alex Jones - a John Bircher supplemented with modern conspiracy theorizing - first appeared on Coast to Coast AM, together with the first set of 9/11 no-planers. At that point the show quickly became a Who's Who of "everything you need to know in conspiracy theory" - all of it disinformation, of course. Apart from a number of Liberty Lobby-type authors that were more welcome at the pro-Nazi Rense.com conspiracy site or even at the Alex Jones Show, almost every significant alien, ancient alien, new age and other conspiracy disinformation pusher has appeared on Coast to Coast AM at one point or another.

The persons and theories that could predominantly be heard on Coast to Coast AM, quickly spread to all corners of the emerging internet: thousands of third rate conspiracy sites, forums and comment sections on news websites, followed by YouTube, including its comment sections; podcasts and social media. Even the History Channel with its Ancient Aliens series heavily borrowed from "experts" listed in the guest archives of Coast to Coast AM.

Of course, over time the old "experts" got old and died off and were replaced with a new generation, generally copying all the same theories and adding a little twist of their own. Once you have researched all the "original" conspiracy theorists and new age gurus though, there really is no express need anymore to keep doing that with the newer generations - because you know what is nonsense, you know what "alternative experts" have systematically been lying about it before, and hence the same government agencies and elite interests can be assumed to be behind it this time around it as well. The conclusion of ISGP's 'Psychedelics & Elitism' article gives a list of elite ties to all the famous psychedelics gurus. They range from the CIA to classic Eastern Establisment names as the Rockefellers and Mellons.

At the same time conspiracy disinformation would be generated from every new controversial event, right from the moment it happens. A perfect example is the 2023 Maui fire in Hawaii. Search for footage on TikTok at the time, and half the suggested videos talked about some kind of conspiracy. Half of those blamed "the elite" for purposely having set the stage. The other half blamed alien space lasers. That's not a joke. A solid quarter of all the videos this author was fed talked about alien space lasers having caused the fire.

Another good example is the ever-present "second shooter" theory. This was, and still is, a legitimate question with the 1963 JFK assassination, but since then has always been tossed in with any other controversial shooting. It was illegitimately done so with the 1968 RFK shooting, with the 2002 Pim Fortuyn shooting, and also in such events as the 2017 Las Vegas shooting. In that last case, in the hours after the shooting Alex Jones already was pointing to a flickering hotel light, claiming that it was proof of a second shooter.

Conspiracy disinformation is a key weapon of the "powers that be", as it greatly muddles discussions, enforces artifically-created stereotypes regarding "conspiracy theorists", and serves as fuel to ridicule, bully and confuse anyone speaking out in favor of a conspiracy. Last but not least: it's the ultimate tool for censorship. Human- and now (secretly) AI-driven bots are generating too much fake news? Well, that's fine. Now the other hand of the globalist movement can "expose the problem" with the aid of "fact checking sites" such as Defeat Disinfo and the Soros-funded Global Disinformation Index, leading to Bilderberg and Trilateral company Google having the perfect excuse to manually start directing its billion+ users toward more "authoritative news sites" - operated by their Bilderberg and Trilateral friends. It censors and gets rid of the ad revenue competition at the same time.

So yes, the moral of the story is: be careful with what you believe, because the fact is that outside of ISGP 99% of conspiracy talk is carefully crafted disinformation. While it may sound absolutely bonkers, among the thousands and thousands of conspiracy pushers on the internet, television, and in books, this author essentially has never identified a genuine conspiracy (theory) pusher. Censorship has become extremely prevailant on this internet in particular, but it hardly makes a difference outside of ISGP being censored, because everything "out there" already was mixed with disinformation.

Notes

---

1. 2005, John Loftus and Mark Aarons, 'The secret war against the Jews', pp. 2, 12.
2. April 27, 1976, New York Times, 'C.I.A. Secretly Owned Insurance Complex and Invested Profits in Stock Market': "The [CIA] agency was involved to some degree in nearly half of all charitable grants by American foundations exclusive of the Ford, Rockefeller and Carnegie organizations, known collectively as the "Big Three.""