"While the rule on hate protects such groups, it does not protect all groups or all forms of identity. For example, the rule does not protect groups of people who are in the majority [i.e., white people]..."
~ RedditHelp.com, 'Account and Community Restrictions: Promoting Hate Based on Identity or Vulnerability' (accessed: June 30, 2020). One of many anti-white measures taken by Silicon Valley's elite. Reddit is by far the largest forum on the internet, basically designed to replace all other forums.
"While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their [colonialist] exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life... With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites..."
Years ago, ISGP produced a Media Psywar Manual: 54 Tactics the Mainstream and Alternative Media Use to Undermine Conspiracy Thinking. Turns out that the media, as well as politicians and other elites, have been equally productive in developing tactics to silence critics of Third World immigration. In this article every single tactic I have (repeatedly) come across over the years is listed. Unfortunately, going back to look for sources per tactic - as was done for the first article - is way too much time, but I'm quite certain the average reader will recognize many of the tactics described.
It should be clear that the only way to keep this blatant, ongoing, criminal conspiracy going is through massive psychological warfare campaigns to disinform and intimidate the masses into submission to the Third World immigration agenda. This psywar campaign basically is the equivalent of the one countering conspiracy thinking in western society.
For those looking for the reasons why elites have implemented white guilt tactics, go to the section 'Elite motives behind white guilt' at the bottom of this article.
- Suppress the vastly higher crime numbers among Third World immigrant groups. Absolutely do not produce any reliable, damning statistics on ethnic crime, as this will provide the public with highly effective ammunition in any public debate.
- Completely ignore evidence of major genetic IQ variations among races for the very same reason.
- Purposely confuse the group with the individual. I.e., counter widely-held opinions and even factual statements on ethnic groups by purposely confusing them with the individual.
For example, when the factually correct statement is made that blacks and Arabs have vastly higher crime numbers than native West-Europeans, ask - preferably indignantly - if immigrant X or Y is a criminal or counter with a statement along the lines as, "Yes, but not EVERY immigrant is a criminal! We shouldn't be prejudiced!"
In other words: people are supposed to ignore statistics.
- Purposely confuse Third World immigration with inter-Western immigration (from Scotland to the U.S., for example). The former - such as Arab, African and Latin American immigration - results in greatly heightened crime numbers and cultural clashes, while the latter hardly hardly does.
- Stigmatize by labeling, obstruct any discussion with it, and bully into the submission. As soon as anybody wants to come out against Third World immigration, start inserting (either as a question or an accusation) labels as "racist", "hater", "Nazi", "white supremacist", "Islamophobe", "Afrophobe", "transphobe" (yes, that too), etc. People are pressured on to the defense, discussions are derailed, and fewer and fewer people dare to speak out in the future for fear of bullying.
- Don't introduce distinctions between "irrational racism" (simply hate) and "rational racism" (based on group statistics and experiences, and making necessary adjustments over that - for sanity and survival), with the latter preferably being given another name. Just force everybody into believing that "we are all equal" - and thus there not being any reason for distinguishing between cultures and races.
- Label critics of Third World immigration as having "fear" of foreign cultures, which is shorthand for "fear of what they do not know". Having "fear" is actually true: people fear cultures with very high crime levels and very hostile attitudes towards their own... for very good reason. Having "fear of what they do not know" - i.e. "xenophobia" ("fear of strangers") - is actually not true: we are intimately familiar with the problems Third World immigrant groups cause us. They are far from "strangers".
- Invent positive buzzwords for Third World immigrants, the best example being "dreamers". This immediately turns any critic into a "hater" or "dream killer".
This is not all that different from a 1929 campaign set up by Eastern Establishment-tied spin doctor Edward Bernays, which tied cigarettes in with feminism, and labeled them "torches of freedom". The campaign aided in getting women to smoke on a mass scale.
- "Just love. Just be positive. I have no time for #haters." An incredibly prevalant attitude since the social media era, in particular among prominent female Instagram models with hundreds of thousands to many millions of followers - really the most incredible echochamber of finely-crafted political propaganda the world has ever seen.
The "just love" argument very much exploits the popular new age "Law of Attraction" idea: just push anything away that is uncomfortable. Imagine police officers refusing to go after rapists and murderers, because they just all "want to focus on the positive."
- Don't report foreign news involving immigrant clashes (including white murders by groups of blacks) with the police or native whites, unless they are too large to ignore.
To those hovering around "populist, alt-right" news websites for balance, it should be clear that regularly immigrant clashes take place in foreign countries, sometimes very large, that simply don't make it to news agencies across the border.
Often, these clashes don't even make the national news. Living in the second-largest city in the Netherlands, I've observed a clash between roughly 150 North African youths and the police in front of a mall located 300 meters (330 yards) from my house, and the reporting on it never went further than a two-line remark on the local police's Twitter account.
- Hide polls showing huge opposition to third world immigration, especially among native whites. This greatly helps in making white people feel isolated in their "hate".
- Refuse to report that anti-immigration protests are financed, organized and coordinated by big business-financed NGOs, in no small part through foundations together worth more than $150 billion, some of which tie back to the CIA.
Left-wing political parties, and apparently CIA/foundation-controlled antifa militants, also play an important role in international protests. Immigrants, women, youngsters, gays and trannies of course always play a major role in these protests as well.
- Don't allow liberal-socialist parties that are strongly anti-immigration, even though polls show this is the dominant thinking in Europe.
Somehow, I have never even heard anyone bring up this point, but it is a fact nevertheless: all "left-wing" parties allow immigrants in for humanitarian reasons; and the center-right does so for neoliberal economic reasons. For some reason, people are not asking questions about this anomaly. All parties also are staunchly pro-European Union, asking no questions about the Third World immigrants it forces onto member countries.
- Divert and limit anti-immigration "rhetoric" to a handful of fringe economically right-wing "populist" parties, who do just that: appeal to "popular opinion" with emotional anti-immigration remarks without focusing on science or engaging in proper debate.
"Populism" of course, by itself, is a derogatory and highly insulting term once again meaning that people are simply misguided. Unfortunately, "populist" candidates are little more than controlled opposition and help keep people divided between opposite extremes, none of which are a solution to the masses.
- Let white people know again and again that they suffer from an "implicit racial bias", that they are "unconscious racists", and that they need to be "educated" on this - maybe even treated for:
"Oh no? You are not racist? Yes, you are. You just don't know it."
The basic purpose here seems to be to always be able to claim that white people are racist, no matter their denials or deeds showing the opposite.
In addition, it seems great for brainwashing white people into thinking that there REALLY (yes!) is something mentally and culturally (slavery) wrong with them, and as a result make them more "open" (read: subservient) towards Third World immigrants and their elite-sponsored white-hating activism.
This point was not part of the original oversight, but became such a dominant part of the racism debate during the Trump era that it had to be added. Not just the news media and social media are full of it, but even government departments and corporations have been giving courses on it to their employees.
- Manipulate immigration polls, for example by not making clear what percentage of the sample involves 1st, 2nd, or 3rd generation Third World immigrants.
- Similarly with these polls, do not pay attention to the fact that tons of people, especially those watching the evening news every night, feel intimidated to say there are "too many" immigrants, probably explaining why year after year generally 30-35% of Europeans say that "there are just enough immigrants" - on top of the 50-55% who say there are "too many".
- However, do point out with these polls that "educated" and "young" people are more "tolerant" of Third World immigrants than "uneducated" and "old" people.
- On television, always focus on "model immigrants" who speak and behave properly, who want people to "be positive", "accepting" and "not fearful", and want to "work together" with the native white people.
Of course, they are very "grateful" to have been allowed into the country, have almost perfectly adopted to the native culture, and preferably have been taken in for some time by an "open minded" native white "guest family" of "model citizens".
I've personally seen a number of television programs on this here in the Netherlands, or noticed "model immigrants" being selected for a variety of television interviews.
- Label economic immigrants as "refugees".
- Repeat every night on the evening news how we have a civic duty to help take care of the streams of refugees from the Arab world and dark Africa, for example because they will be killed in their own country.
- Never-ever talk about when these Third World political refugees, or "guest workers", might be going home again.
- Introduce pointless debates that talk around the (statistical) facts to simulate democracy. These discussions - usually along the lines of economic value and "not all immigrants are bad" remarks - can continue forever without solution. One can even introduce terms as "triggering" and "micro-aggressions" to obstruct, antagonize and ridicule the other side of the table, usually "populists" with their own buzzwords and cookier-cutter remarks.
- Put the whole country on edge, ideally through an "outrage" crowd of semi-anonymous social media trolls, by analyzing every statement on ethnicity as a potentially racist comment, which helps in preventing any discussion about Third World immigration.
- Do not allow ANY kind of discussion on racial differences, not even "positive racism", such as blacks from West-Africa having more fast-twitch muscles or blacks from East-Africa having more natural endurance. These are long-known scientifically verifiable facts, but are increasingly hard to bring up due to "outrage politics".
- Introduce the term "scientific racism" when you can't win the debate on ethnic IQ and ethnic or cultural crime numbers.
I suddenly saw this term used by "liberal CIA" Vox Media, some time after I produced my original 2016 ethnic IQ article.
Introducing yet another little buzzword like that is quite smart. It allows elites to more comfortably ignore key data while putting any messenger immediately on the defensive. You mention black crime numbers? "Stop! ... Racist!" You mention crime and cultural issues with Muslim immigrants? "Stop! ... Islamophobe!" You criticize all Third World immigration? "Stop! ... Hater!" You bring up ethnic IQ numbers? "Stop! ... That's scientific racism!" The term is very silly though. Facts are still facts, no matter what real or imagined emotions a messenger might have. Someone must be getting desperate.
To illustrate further, Hitler's crusade against the Jews was not based on scientific (eugenist) fact, nor was the elitist "Anglo-Saxon" or "Nordic" propaganda of the Eastern Establishment that preceded and inspired it. Elites can never get things right, it appears. And maybe that is not a coincidence.
- Refuse to criticize or even acknowledge the increasingly common racism of Third World cultures or U.S. blacks towards whites. Calling white people "white boy", "boy", "honky", "cracker", "cheesehead", "tatta" should just be laughed off as something innocent, while a white man calling a black man "boy" is the end of the world - as we saw with the 2017 press conferences with Conor McGregor and Floyd Mayweather.
In fact, as the Reddit community guidelines at the top of this article make clear (and it uses an increasingly prominent argument): black and other Third World immigrants can be as racist as they want towards whites, right because they are minorities and it has been "determined" that they have been oppressed by whites for centuries... The argument makes no sense whatsoever, but if you have enough power, you don't have to make sense.
- Ignore studies revealing non-whites to be less racist than blacks and Muslims. Again, for the very same reason to prevent giving the masses lethal ammunition during political debates.
- Allow minority groups, especially blacks, to continue to have their own publications and social events, despite the fact that we live in an era with numerous black superstars, movie actors and politicians, including a U.S. president (and that in a country that only is 11% black).
- Allow minority groups to claim that they are still oppressed by white people, such as with the Black Lives Matter movement, without pointing out their own vastly heightened crime numbers, higher levels of racism, and overall lack of cultural and scientific achievements.
- Have your (mainly white) minions in the media, politics and among activist groups time and again claim that the white race still is (unconsciously) racist and still benefits from racism.
- Along the exact same lines, have your minions point out that the white race needs to repent and pay restitution for its historical sin of black slavery - no matter that this has been the way of the world for thousands of years, and that blacks in Africa already had enslaved each other to the tune of 70% when westerners arrived.
Combined with the previous tactic, there are several advantages here for elites: whip up the Third World masses against the white majority; and shut up the white majority as they lose their country and influence at the voting booths. It also opens the door to eventual war with, and mass rape by, Third World immigrants (actually already happening looking at crime numbers); or forced or voluntary intermarriage down the line. If whites feel guilty, they will allow much more to be done to them than when they still have their self-respect.
- Allow the entire world to be proud of their race or culture, except white people. A good example would be MMA fighter Cain Velasquez, who, without issue, can fight with a "Brown Pride" tattoo on his chest, while white Americans can hardly wear rebel flag caps (as a symbol of country lifestyle) without being called out about it or even being assaulted for it.
- In line with the previous point: do not allow whites to have ANY acceptable non-Hitlerite cultural symbols to rally and unify behind in their opposition to immigration.
- Refuse to acknowledge that modern "white pride" feelings have little to do with the Nazis (despite the exclusive focus on that), but much more with a desire to retain quickly-eroding white culture and frustration with the vastly heightened crime numbers among Third World immigrants.
- Suppress unemployment numbers among Third World immigrant groups. And when you do bring it up, mention that "racial bias" is probably the main cause.
- When it comes to Muslims in the West, limit discussion of widespread religious extremism, including anti-West feelings, Sharia support, and hatred of homosexuals and Jews.
- Always claim that Muslim extremists are "isolated cases" who apparently caught some kind of infectious disease ("he just got radicalized") or, at the very least, involves a problem that can be solved. Muslim support for suicide bombings and overall religious extremism is rather widespread.
- Always be quick to point out that the latest Muslim terrorist "only acted alone", "may not have had a terrorist motive", or "may just have had psychological issues", without acknowledging that the policy of bringing in millions of Muslim immigrants into the West is the primary cause of this permanent terror threat. This is slightly different from ignoring the widespread anti-West feelings among Muslims (or sticking to the "lone nut" theory), because even if only 1 in 100 Muslims can be considered "radical" the immigration numbers still amount to several hundred thousand "radical" "individuals".
- Hide as much as possible from the media the names, and with that the ethnicity, of foreign terrorists and criminals. Unless it involves a white person.
- Never discuss the "conspiracy theory" that Europe's failure to stop the never-ending refugee crisis actually is part of the agenda. Similar that the removal of Gaddafi and the related rise of ISIS were allowed on purpose in order to open the floodgates to millions of political and economic refugees.
Maybe we should really ask why the European Union can't stop the truck convoys on North Africa's shores before their cargo is put into boats en route to Europe. This strategy would be a game-changer, as apparently the law of the seas requires the European Union to bring refugees to European shores.
- Always ignore the fact that the endless demonizing by politicians and the media of their own native white people - increasingly through the antifa and groups as Black Lives Matter - actually represents the "hate" and "racism" they accuse these white masses of.
- Feign innocence that this climate of demonization has "populist" politicians and any potential white activist fear for their lives. Let's not forget that this climate led to the murder of key prime ministerial candidate Pim Fortuyn in 2002 and is a major threat to politicians as Donald Trump, as it almost guarantees that people are going to try to murder these individuals. In early 2017 the Dutch "populist" prime ministerial candidate Geert Wilders was the target of a failed plot involving Muslim Moroccans who had infiltrated the police. There's little evidence that liberal elites actually disapprove of these plots.
- Promote the stereotype that only people in the backlands who never met a foreigner are critical of Third World immigration, while in reality a huge amount of resistance comes from people in the big cities (such as with Pim Fortuyn in 2002) who are confronted by Third World immigrants on a daily basis - or that large percentage of natives that have fled the big cities to the suburbs.
Fact is, I always was very open-minded. But being confronted on a daily bases for decades on end with vastly heightened Third World immigrant crime and allround a-social behavior, has actually "radicalized" me. I.e., I'm guilte of speaking out against all the elite propaganda.
- Laugh at people criticizing Third World immigration as being "too serious" and "too dramatic".
- Refer to Muslim crime as being "Asian". This trick is particularly often used in case of Afghanis and Pakistanis (such as in the British press), but sometimes is also used for Middle Easterners as Iraqis and Syrians (such as in Norwegian police reports). Technically, the term is correct, but at the same time it is highly misleading because true Far East Asians as Koreans and Japanese have extremely low crime numbers.
- Make the claim that the crusades, colonial era, and overall white racism are responsible for the greatly heightened crime numbers among Muslims and blacks in the West.
As discussed in ISGP's article on black crime, as late as 2009, a British official concluded that the greatly heightened gang rape numbers for blacks and Britain is the result of "Britain's long history of racism and imperialism". Fascinating. What then about rape numbers in Africa?
This thinking is so incredibly irrational that it doesn't tend to work very well on men amongst each other, but the influence (beautiful, often through make up) women have on men is exceptional, especially in terms of making them feel rejected - so the "just love" argument is a very, very powerful tool to use. And one more reason why the globalist movement loves feminism.
In one of his interviews of the 1960s, Malcolm X actually explained that the "Just love, just be better than them," argument was used on plantations to help slaves remain docile. True or not, it helps to show that this argument can easily be implemented as one of the most insidious forms of propaganda.
Let's theorize, from ISGP's viewpoint of a CIA-big business clique secretly running the West, what would be the purpose of the pushing of all this seemingly irrational white guilt in western society, not to mention extremist feminism, LGBTQ and veganism. Likely reasons include the following:
- The initial problem: putting women to work instead of all of them having the necessary 2-3 babies on average (feminism) doubles economic output and lessens social security burdens - but crashes the birth rates. Anti-conception, similarly pushed for many decades by Eastern Establishment elites, has additionally crashed native white birth rates.
The easiest way to guarantee permanent neoliberal stock market growth (businesses expanding, banks loaning and investing) is to increase the population of a country. This leaves elites with two options: bring back the "nuclear family" (husband, women, children) through re-education and large amounts of social spending (read: higher taxes) - or bring labor in from across the border.
Clearly option two was picked.
- One massive set of benefits of Third World immigration to western corporations - small and large - in general is Third World immigrants accepting lower wages, longer working hours, no overtime compensation. They also do not join labor unions or protest their circumstances very much. (big business psywar perversion: "They are less spoiled!") In fact, very often they do not even speak the language, even those of fellow co-workers. That way, it is impossible to really organize against employers, which is only in the benefit of said employers.
The wholesale replacing of whites with Third World immigrants in many lowly-skilled jobs in particular is well-documented - but really needs to be investigated in much more detail. And certainly should be questioned more.
- Another benefit for bringing in Third World immigrants from regions surrounding the West is that it becomes much easier down the line to expand economic "free trade" areas to these regions. The European Union very much wants to expand towards the Middle East and North Africa, while in North America NAFTA has been established, with long-time talk of a North America Union and an "Amero" coin.
Quite obviously, banks and multinationals are looking to turn all of the Americas into one "free trade" zone, which, for example, is why David Rockefeller founded the Americas Society and such. Update: Ironically, I'd completely forgotten about the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), which failed in 2005. A video exists of David Rockefeller thanking U.S. vice president Dick Cheney for his support of the FTAA, when Cheney stopped by the CFR in the early 2000s. Democrat or Republican: it really doesn't matter when it comes to expanding trade zones.
- In line with the previous points, mass, rapid replacement of whites by a hotch-potch of Third World immigrants is additionally desirable, because it makes whites powerless at the voting booth, or even in case of civil war, to revert these big business changes made to western society. It also becomes futile for whites to stop "free trade" expansion towards the Third World once they start crashing below 50% or so.
- Higher numbers of Third World immigration will result into higher levels of racial intermarriage and mixed babies, especially when the status of Third World immigrants is artificially heightened through social programs, with the self-esteem of whites completely shattered through white guilt.
- Third World immigration will eventually require a high-tech police state to keep order, with existing big business monopolies and cartels continuing to run it from behind the scenes.
White people in western countries have had a lot of luxury in recent decades, to the point they have started to ask too many questions about elite conspiracies (JFK, 9/11) and who is ruling them from behind the scenes. They are also straying off the beaten path with regard to established religion (including the new religion of no religion: extremist atheism).
All of this is a major threat to the CIA-big business elites running our society. As documented in-depth by ISGP, these elites are spending absolutely enormous amounts of resources to keep the population divided and confused with conspiracy disinformation - to the point that one can't help but think that they looking to crush all this type of dissent one way or another.
One good way would be to simply reduce white people to small minorities in their own countries, with all the rest consisting of 50 different low-consciouness nationalities who want little to do with each other, nor care about the cultural history of the West. It doesn't matter how criminal some of these ethnicities are, because eventually microchip tracking and other high-tech gadgets will keep them in line. White people will be subjected to the same high-tech big-businees-ran police state.
- In addition, this CIA-big business lens also helps explain why there is such an obsession among (Rockefeller) elites to do away with meat - through groups as the Meat Free Monday campaign and MUSE Global such - and really even turn us all into full-fledged vegans. Why? Well, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and pollution. However, the smaller "ecological footprint" and increased living space as a result of doing away with the livestock industry has the additional benefit of being able to cram more people on every square inch of land. And that means: more economic growth and higher stock prices.
- Another example that ties back to the stock market: since the mid 2010s the Eurozone has actually been experiences zero- and then unprecedented negative interest rates, this because billions upon billions have been pumped from the economically strong northern countries into stagnant and collapsing economies of the south, Greece in particular. In other words, if you have 1,000,000 euros on the bank, in the past the bank would pay you between 15,000 and 30,000 euros annually. Now? They increasingly start to charge you that amount, because they can loan it interest free and even at a profit from the (Rockefeller-controlled) European Central Bank.
So what is the lone benefit of this bizarre system? At least to big business? That would be the stock market, because many people will start looking for alternatives to store their money. And one alternative is basically gamble with it on the stock market. Alternately, they just start spending it, which is also something economists love. More people will also have to keep working, because essentially working class people get poorer and it becomes impossible to built an interest-based nest egg.
- If one looks through this CIA-big business lens, one can actually see how the good-old Rockefeller agenda of creating a world government with a new age world religion actually can be completely compatible with big business. Why? Because everything revolves around expanding national economies and international free trade zones, necessitating racial interbreeding. In this sense, striving towards world government is essential. In past centuries they tried it by means of empire. But invasions and slavery result in too much opposition these days, so now they try it in a different way.
So yes, it does appear that money and greed among elites can explain every aspect of the implemented white guilt policy. Just looking at the absolute sheer panic in big business-controlled media and political circles whenever an (already controlled) "conservative CIA" politician is close to being elected, and it becomes obvious that "something" is fighting for its very survival; just lashing out whenever its stock value or economic expansion is threatened in the slightest manner.
White guilt to force white people into submission isn't the only implemented weapon, of course. Big business-pushed Third World immigration also explains why white men in particular are being made the enemy through "sexism": historically it is white men who came together and staged protests and riots against big business. Now most of them are told to stay home while a brainwashed, irrational freak show of women, children, trannys, lesbians, gays and Third Worlders are organized by elites to march the streets. They all have a right to exist, of course, but they are clearly being manipulated.
At this point, seeing the absolutely ENORMOUS, TOTAL CONTROL over every form of media in our society and seeing how even Donald Trump is secretly pro-Third World immigration and nothing but a "conservative CIA" conspiracy disinformer, it really looks as if the battle is over: the West is dead. In the 1930s big business financed Hitler, Mussolini and Franco in a frantic effort to destroy communism - but we survived, because we had a large degree of racial and cultural integrity. It's hard to imagine though how we in the West will be able to get rid of 100 million+ Arabs and blacks by 2050, at which point Europe is hoping to have imported an additional 50 million Third World immigrants into its borders. 
In 2017, amidst the ongoing so-called immigration crisis, the European Commission even set up programs to actively recruit and bring in refugees from "Libya, Egypt, Niger, Sudan, Tsjaad and Ethiopia" - all countries with greatly heightened crime numbers and tons of Muslim extremism.  Meanwhile, elites refused any discussion on upping the native birth rates. If anyone would even openly contemplate the idea, he or she would be shot down for being "racist".
Next, after the mid 2020 Black Lives Matter uprisings in the United States and then Europe, it really started to become the norm for anyone opposing Third World immigration - even in the mildest of terms - to be immediately "canceled": pulled from social media or forums, virtually removed from Google, deleted from television or radio, or shut down in business through withdrawing sponsors. The anti-white police state just became "normal".
So, does the West have a future? Can we succeed in countering this psywar? Who knows, but with the present consciousness, I don't see how.