"While the rule on hate protects such groups, it does not protect all groups or all forms of identity. For example, the rule does not protect groups of people who are in the majority [i.e., white people]..."
~ RedditHelp.com, 'Account and Community Restrictions: Promoting Hate Based on Identity or Vulnerability' (accessed: June 30, 2020). One of many anti-white measures taken by Silicon Valley's elite. Reddit is by far the largest forum on the internet, basically designed to replace all other forums.
"While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their [colonialist] exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life... With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites..."
Years ago, ISGP produced a Media Psywar Manual: 54 Tactics the Mainstream and Alternative Media Use to Undermine Conspiracy Thinking. Turns out that the media, as well as politicians and other elites, have been equally productive in developing tactics to silence critics of Third World immigration. In this article every single tactic I have (repeatedly) come across over the years is listed. Unfortunately, going back to look for sources per tactic - as was done for the first article - is way too much time, but I'm quite certain the average reader will recognize many of the tactics described.
It should be clear that the only way to keep this blatant, ongoing, criminal conspiracy going is through massive psychological warfare campaigns to disinform and intimidate the masses into submission to the Third World immigration agenda. This psywar campaign basically is the equivalent of the one countering conspiracy thinking in western society.
For those looking for the reasons why elites have implemented white guilt tactics, go to the section 'Elite motives behind white guilt' at the bottom of this article.
- Suppress the vastly higher crime numbers among Third World immigrant groups. Absolutely do not produce any reliable, damning statistics on ethnic crime, as this will provide the public with highly effective ammunition in any public debate.
- Completely ignore evidence of major genetic IQ variations among races for the very same reason.
- Counter widely-held opinions and even factual statements on ethnic groups by purposely confusing them with the individual. For example, when the factually correct statement is made that blacks and Arabs have vastly higher crime numbers than native West-Europeans, ask - preferably indignantly - if immigrant X or Y is a criminal or counter with a statement along the lines as, "Yes, but not every immigrant is a criminal. We shouldn't be prejudiced." In other words: people are supposed to ignore statistics.
- Purposely confuse Arab, African and Latin American immigration, which results in greatly heightened crime numbers and cultural clashes, with inter-Western immigration (from Scotland to the U.S., for example) that leads to hardly any of these problems.
- Ignore foreign news on immigrant clashes with the police or native whites, unless they are too large to ignore. To illustrate, it has happened many times that in the "alt-right" news I read about Jihadi-inspired violence against whites in places as Great Britain or Sweden (including links to local mainstream sources), but that the Dutch press, including the Netherlands' largest news aggegrate website, Nu.nl (controlled by a Bilderberg company), was completely silent about it.
- Ignore the enormous frustration among the masses with regard to immigration, especially in major West-European cities. Just brush off all criticism as the misguided opinions of individuals, or, in case the whole country is on fire, as equally misguided "populism", a vague, derogatory and highly insulting term once again meaning that people are simply misguided.
- Refuse to report that international protests against conservative / anti-immigrant political candidates and leaders, especially Donald Trump, are largely organized by institutes financed by elite liberal foundations with a combined worth of about $150 billion.
- Ignore the fact that people today are brainwashed into thinking that it is normal that neither in Europe nor North America political parties exist that are both pro-liberal globalist and pro-EU while also being staunchly anti-immigration, leaving the people divided between opposite extremes.
- Intimidate the masses by staging pro-immigration protests in which participants continuously and irrationally use slurs as "racist", "hater", "Nazi" and "Islamophobe" against anyone opposing unrestrained Third World immigration. With this tactic, factional, rational and productive debates that would expose flaws in logic are thwarted.
- Label critics of Third World immigration as having "fear" of foreign cultures, a "fear of what they do not know".
- Hide as much as possible polls revealing that the overwhelming majority of native white citizens is completely against any additional Third World immigration.
- Whenever polls are conducted that reveal how native white citizens are completely against any additional Third World immigration, do not make clear what percentage of the sample involves 1st, 2nd, or 3rd generation Third World immigrants.
- Similarly with these polls, do not pay attention to the fact that tons of people, especially those watching the evening news every night, feel intimidated to say there are "too many" immigrants, probably explaining why year after year generally 30-35% of Europeans say that "there are just enough immigrants" - on top of the 50-55% who say there are "too many".
- However, do point out with these polls that "educated" and "young" people are more "tolerant" of Third World immigrants than "uneducated" and "old" people.
- On television, always focus on "model immigrants" who speak and behave properly, who want people to "be positive", "accepting" and "not fearful", and want to "work together" with the native white people.
- For television, do specials on "model immigrants" who are "grateful" to have been allowed into the country, have almost perfectly adopted to the native culture, and preferably have been taken in for some time by an "open minded" native white "guest family" of "model citizens".
- Repeat every night on the evening news how we have a civic duty to help take care of the streams of refugees from the Arab world and dark Africa, for example because they will be killed in their own country.
- Never-ever talk about when these Third World political refugees might be going home again.
- Introduce pointless debates that talk around the facts (such as racial crime and IQ statistics), so that discussions can continue forever without solution, while at the same time giving us the illusion that freedom of speech is being exercised. Preferably introduce terms as "triggering" and "micro-aggressions" to antagonize and ridicule the other side of the table, which in turn plays into these buzzwords. Obviously, we're making reference here to NGO-tied, "liberal CIA"-type, private intelligence operations to divide the masses in the West.
- Put the whole country on edge by analyzing every statement on ethnicity as a potentially racist comment, which helps in preventing any discussion about Third World immigration.
- Do not allow any kind of discussion on racial differences, not even when it involves scientifically verifiable "positive racism", such as blacks from West-Africa having more fast-twitch muscles or blacks from East-Africa having more natural endurance.
- Introduce the term "scientific racism" when you can't win the debate on ethnic IQ and ethnic or cultural crime numbers. I suddenly saw the "liberal CIA" Vox Media do that some time after I produced my ethnic IQ article. Must be a coincidence, as earlier I couldn't find a word in the "alt-left" media about this, or even the "alt-right".
Introducing yet another little buzzword like that is quite smart. It allows elites to more comfortably ignore key data while putting any messenger immediately on the defensive. You mention black crime numbers? "Stop! ... Racist!" You mention crime and cultural issues with Muslim immigrants? "Stop! ... Islamophobe!" You criticize all Third World immigration? "Stop! ... Hater!" You bring up ethnic IQ numbers? "Stop! ... That's scientific racism!" The term is very silly though. Facts are still facts, no matter what real or imagined emotions a messenger might have. Someone must be getting desperate.
To illustrate further, Hitler's crusade against the Jews was not based on scientific fact, nor was the elitist "Anglo-Saxon" or "Nordic" propaganda of the Eastern Establishment that preceded and inspired it. Elites can never get things right, it appears. And maybe that is not a coincidence.
- Refuse to criticize or even acknowledge the increasingly common racism of Third World cultures or U.S. blacks towards whites. Calling white people "white boy", "boy", "honky", "cracker", "cheesehead", "tatta" should just be laughed off as something innocent while a white man calling a black man "boy" is the end of the world - as we saw with the 2017 press conferences with Conor McGregor and Floyd Mayweather.
- Ignore studies revealing that non-whites as blacks and Muslims domestically and in many places of the world are more racist than white people. Again, for the very same reason to prevent giving the masses lethal ammunition during political debates.
- Allow minority groups, especially blacks, to continue to have their own publications and social events, despite the fact that we live in an era with numerous black superstars, movie actors and politicians, including a U.S. president (and that in a country that only is 11% black).
- Allow minority groups to claim that they are suppressed by white people, such as with the Black Lives Matter movement, without pointing out their own vastly heightened crime numbers, higher levels of racism, and overall lack of education and culture.
- Allow the entire world to be proud of their race or culture, except white people. A good example would be MMA fighter Cain Velasquez, who, without issue, can fight with a "Brown Pride" tattoo on his chest, while white Americans can hardly wear rebel flag caps (as a symbol of country lifestyle) without being called out about it or even being assaulted for it. Thus, do not allow whites to have any acceptable non-Hitlerite cultural symbols to rally and unify behind.
- Refuse to acknowledge that modern "white pride" feelings in 95% of cases don't have the slightest bit to do with sympathies for Hitler, but much more with a desire to retain quickly-eroding white culture.
- Suppress unemployment numbers among Third World immigrant groups. And when you do bring it up, mention that "racial bias" is probably the main cause.
- When it comes to Muslims in Europe, limit discussions of widespread religious extremism, including anti-West feelings, Sharia support, and hatred of homosexuals and Jews.
- Always point out Muslim extremists are "isolated cases" who apparently caught some kind of infectious disease ("he just got radicalized") or, at the very least, involves a problem that can be solved. Muslim support for suicide bombings and overall religious extremism is rather widespread.
- Always be quick to point out that the latest Muslim terrorist "only acted alone" without acknowledging that the policy of bringing in millions of Muslim immigrants into the West is the primary cause of this permanent terror threat. This is slightly different from ignoring the widespread anti-West feelings among Muslims (or sticking to the "lone nut" theory), because even if only 1 in 100 Muslims can be considered "radical" the immigration numbers still amount to several hundred thousand "radical" "individuals".
- Hide the names, and with that the nationality, of criminals in the media when reporting on the most recent crimes.
- Never discuss that the removal of Gaddafi and the related rise of ISIS, which opened the floodgates to millions of political refugees, might be something elites would actually consider a good thing. Or why the European Union can't stop the truck convoys on North Africa's shores before their cargo is put into boats en route to Europe. This strategy would be a game-changer, as apparently the law of the seas requires the European Union to bring refugees to European shores.
- Always ignore the fact that the endless demonizing by politicians and the media of their own native white people actually represents the "hate" and "racism" they accuse these white masses of.
- Feign innocence that this demonizing climate of "populist" candidates largely led to the murder of key prime ministerial candidate Pim Fortuyn in 2002 and is a major threat to politicians as Donald Trump, as it almost guarantees that people are going to try to murder these individuals. In early 2017 the Dutch "populist" prime ministerial candidate Geert Wilders was the target of a failed plot involving Muslim Moroccans who had infiltrated the police. There's little evidence that liberal elites actually disapprove of these plots.
- Promote the stereotype that only people in the backlands who never met a foreigner are critical of Third World immigration, while in reality the vast majority of resistance comes from people in the big cities who are confronted by Third World immigrants on a daily basis - or that large percentage of natives that have fled the big cities to the suburbs.
- Laugh at people criticizing Third World immigration as being "too serious" and "too dramatic".
- Refer to Arab Muslims and Muslim terrorists as "Asians". This trick is particularly often used in case of Afghanis and Pakistanis (such as in the British press), but sometimes is also used for Middle Easterners as Iraqis and Syrians (such as in Norwegian police reports). Technically, the term is correct, but at the same time it is highly misleading because true Far East Asians as Koreans and Japanese have extremely low crime numbers.
- Make the claim that the crusades, colonial era, and overall white racism are responsible for the greatly heightened crime numbers among Muslims and blacks in the West. As discussed in ISGP's article on black crime, as late as 2009, a British official concluded that the greatly heightened gang rape numbers for blacks and Britain is the result of "Britain's long history of racism and imperialism". Fascinating. What then about rape numbers in Africa?
Let's theorize, from ISGP's viewpoint of a CIA-big business clique secretly running the West, what would be the purpose of the pushing of all this seemingly irrational white guilt in western society, not to mention extremist feminism, LGBTQ and veganism. Likely reasons include the following:
- The initial problem: putting women to work instead of all of them having the necessary 2-3 babies on average (feminism) doubles economic output and lessens social security burdens - but crashes the birth rates. Anti-conception, similarly pushed for many decades by Eastern Establishment elites, has additionally crashed native white birth rates.
The easiest way to guarantee permanent neoliberal stock market growth (businesses expanding, banks loaning and investing) is to increase the population of a country. This leaves elites with two options: bring back the "nuclear family" (husband, women, children) through re-education and large amounts of social spending (read: higher taxes) - or bring labor in from across the border.
Clearly option two was picked.
- One massive set of benefits of Third World immigration to western corporations - small and large - in general is Third World immigrants accepting lower wages, longer working hours, no overtime compensation. They also do not join labor unions or protest their circumstances very much. (big business psywar perversion: "They are less spoiled!") In fact, very often they do not even speak the language, even those of fellow co-workers. That way, it is impossible to really organize against employers, which is only in the benefit of said employers.
The wholesale replacing of whites with Third World immigrants in many lowly-skilled jobs in particular is well-documented - but really needs to be investigated in much more detail. And certainly should be questioned more.
- Another benefit for bringing in Third World immigrants from regions surrounding the West is that it becomes much easier down the line to expand economic "free trade" areas to these regions. The European Union very much wants to expand towards the Middle East and North Africa, while in North America NAFTA has been established, with long-time talk of a North America Union and an "Amero" coin. Quite obviously, banks and multinationals are looking to turn all of the Americas into one "free trade" zone, which, for example, is why David Rockefeller founded the Americas Society and such.
- In line with the previous points, mass, rapid replacement of whites by a hotch-potch of Third World immigrants is additionally desirable, because it makes whites powerless at the voting booth, or even in case of civil war, to revert these big business changes made to western society. It also becomes futile for whites to stop "free trade" expansion towards the Third World once they start crashing below 50% or so.
- Higher numbers of Third World immigration will result into higher levels of racial intermarriage and mixed babies, especially when the status of Third World immigrants is artificially heightened through social programs, with the self-esteem of whites completely shattered through white guilt.
- Third World immigration will eventually require a high-tech police state to keep order, with existing big business monopolies and cartels continuing to run it from behind the scenes.
White people in western countries have had a lot of luxury in recent decades, to the point they have started to ask too many questions about elite conspiracies (JFK, 9/11) and who is ruling them from behind the scenes. They are also straying off the beaten path with regard to established religion (including the new religion of no religion: extremist atheism).
All of this is a major threat to the CIA-big business elites running our society. As documented in-depth by ISGP, these elites are spending absolutely enormous amounts of resources to keep the population divided and confused with conspiracy disinformation - to the point that one can't help but think that they looking to crush all this type of dissent one way or another.
One good way would be to simply reduce white people to small minorities in their own countries, with all the rest consisting of 50 different low-consciouness nationalities who want little to do with each other, nor care about the cultural history of the West. It doesn't matter how criminal some of these ethnicities are, because eventually microchip tracking and other high-tech gadgets will keep them in line. White people will be subjected to the same high-tech big-businees-ran police state.
- In addition, this CIA-big business lens also helps explain why there is such an obsession among (Rockefeller) elites to do away with meat - through groups as the Meat Free Monday campaign and such - and really even turn us all into full-fledged vegans. Why? Well, to reduce "carbon footprints" and allround "ecological footprints". Which has the additional benefit of cramming more people on every square inch of land. And that means: more economic growth and higher stock prices. Synthesized factory meat has the same benefit.
- Another example that ties back to the stock market: since the mid 2010s the Eurozone has actually been experiences zero- and then unprecedented negative interest rates, this because billions upon billions have been pumped from the economically strong northern countries into stagnant and collapsing economies of the south, Greece in particular. In other words, if you have 1,000,000 euros on the bank, in the past the bank would pay you between 15,000 and 30,000 euros annually. Now? They increasingly start to charge you that amount, because they can loan it interest free and even at a profit from the (Rockefeller-controlled) European Central Bank.
So what is the lone benefit of this bizarre system? At least to big business? That would be the stock market, because many people will start looking for alternatives to store their money. And one alternative is basically gamble with it on the stock market. Alternately, they just start spending it, which is also something economists love. More people will also have to keep working, because essentially working class people get poorer and it becomes impossible to built an interest-based nest egg.
- If one looks through this CIA-big business lens, one can actually see how the good-old Rockefeller agenda of creating a world government with a new age world religion actually can be completely compatible with big business. Why? Because everything revolves around expanding national economies and international free trade zones, necessitating racial interbreeding. In this sense, striving towards world government is essential. In past centuries they tried it by means of empire. But invasions and slavery result in too much opposition these days, so now they try it in a different way.
So yes, it does appear that money and greed among elites can explain every aspect of the implemented white guilt policy. Just looking at the absolute sheer panic in big business-controlled media and political circles whenever an (already controlled) "conservative CIA" politician is close to being elected, and it becomes obvious that "something" is fighting for its very survival; just lashing out whenever its stock value or economic expansion is threatened in the slightest manner.
White guilt to force white people into submission isn't the only implemented weapon, of course. Big business-pushed Third World immigration also explains why white men in particular are being made the enemy through "sexism": historically it is white men who came together and staged protests and riots against big business. Now most of them are told to stay home while a brainwashed, irrational freak show of women, children, trannys, lesbians, gays and Third Worlders are organized by elites to march the streets. They all have a right to exist, of course, but they are clearly being manipulated.
At this point, seeing the absolutely ENORMOUS, TOTAL CONTROL over every form of media in our society and seeing how even Donald Trump is secretly pro-Third World immigration and nothing but a "conservative CIA" conspiracy disinformer, it really looks as if the battle is over: the West is dead. In the 1930s big business financed Hitler, Mussolini and Franco in a frantic effort to destroy communism - but we survived, because we had a large degree of racial and cultural integrity. It's hard to imagine though how we in the West will be able to get rid of 100 million+ Arabs and blacks by 2050, at which point Europe is hoping to have imported an additional 50 million Third World immigrants into its borders. 
In 2017, amidst the ongoing so-called immigration crisis, the European Commission even set up programs to actively recruit and bring in refugees from "Libya, Egypt, Niger, Sudan, Tsjaad and Ethiopia" - all countries with greatly heightened crime numbers and tons of Muslim extremism.  Meanwhile, elites refused any discussion on upping the native birth rates. If anyone would even openly contemplate the idea, he or she would be shot down for being "racist".
Next, after the mid 2020 Black Lives Matter uprisings in the United States and then Europe, it really started to become the norm for anyone opposing Third World immigration - even in the mildest of terms - to be immediately "canceled": pulled from social media or forums, virtually removed from Google, deleted from television or radio, or shut down in business through withdrawing sponsors. The anti-white police state just became "normal".
So, does the West have a future? Can we succeed in countering this psywar? Who knows, but with the present consciousness, I don't see how.