ISGP's Supernatural Research Center
More articles
About
The truth is, this author has wanted a Supernatural Research Center since ISGP's very beginnings in 2005 (and really 2003). However, the first 20 years largely ended up being spent documenting all the conspiracy, UFO and new age disinformation being pushed through shows as Coast to Coast AM.
It also tends to be a very dicy mix: political analysis with spirituality. Then again, around the time of creating this center, the BBC 1, New York Post 2, and Daily Mail 3 all reported on a study into near-death experiences. Even the New York Times 4 and the Washington Post have occasionally reported about ghosts. 5 And now it is me.
Is it going to be great for "credibility" and getting people to link to you? Maybe not. However, no mainstream or alternative media wants to link to ISGP anyway, and average people can't even find it due to Google Censorship, so who cares anymore? On top of that, much of ISGP's research came to be intertwined with famous people, providing a much-needed layer of "fuck you". I'm not sure how much is going to ever be discussed here though. Maybe I'll upload everything next week. Or I will never do it.
In any case, maybe slowly, through this center, ISGP can also start to genuinely try to build a credible foundation in the supernatural domain as well. This basically still is just a preliminary trial center though. In order to really get to the bottom of various issues, money for travel expenses and "access" likely is needed to a greater extent than with writing about political affairs.
I have neither.
It also tends to be a very dicy mix: political analysis with spirituality. Then again, around the time of creating this center, the BBC 1, New York Post 2, and Daily Mail 3 all reported on a study into near-death experiences. Even the New York Times 4 and the Washington Post have occasionally reported about ghosts. 5 And now it is me.
Is it going to be great for "credibility" and getting people to link to you? Maybe not. However, no mainstream or alternative media wants to link to ISGP anyway, and average people can't even find it due to Google Censorship, so who cares anymore? On top of that, much of ISGP's research came to be intertwined with famous people, providing a much-needed layer of "fuck you". I'm not sure how much is going to ever be discussed here though. Maybe I'll upload everything next week. Or I will never do it.
In any case, maybe slowly, through this center, ISGP can also start to genuinely try to build a credible foundation in the supernatural domain as well. This basically still is just a preliminary trial center though. In order to really get to the bottom of various issues, money for travel expenses and "access" likely is needed to a greater extent than with writing about political affairs.
I have neither.
Notes
- June 7, 2025, BBC's Science Focus, 'What is it like to die? The reassuring science of near-death experiences'.
- Oct. 14, 2025, New York Post, '70% of people who have a near-death experience make this change...'
- Oct. 15, 2025, Daily Mail, 'Scientists reveal what really happens after someone has a near-death experience.'
- July 26, 1973, New York Times, 'Notes on People Gov. Holton's Haunted Mansion'.
- A) May 13, 1900, Washington Post, 'Phantoms of Museum: Shades of Scientists Who Walk There Nightly. Employees Think it is Haunted.' (Photocopy).
B) Oct. 28, 1982, Washington Post, 'Ghosts Galore': "According to sources including Queen Juliana of the Netherlands and Winston Churchill (both of whom reported seeing [the ghost of] Lincoln at the White House), he walks the long hallway on the second floor, sometimes stopping to knock on doors. Storytellers note that Churchill saw Lincoln late one night after one of his secret World War II meetings with FDR; he avoided sleeping in the Lincoln Bedroom ever after."