Third World migrants, mainly from the Muslim world, have been making it into Europe as "guest workers" since at least the 1970s. These "guests workers" never left, of course. The number of immigrants kept increasing throughout the 1980s and 1990s as native white birth numbers began to dwindle. Already in the early 1990s tropical swimming pools were registering an enormous problem of gang molestations by Muslim youths; it was all swept under the carpet over economic reasons. In 2008 the EU's statistical agency, Eurostat, quietly concluded that the European Union would need an enormous, additional 56 million Third World immigrants until 2050 in order to keep available pensions and health care for the retired - and, of course, to grow the economy.  And thus, anno 2017, the European Union is home to about 20 million Muslims from the Middle East and North Africa. This rate is exponentially increasing, the estimate being that 8% of Europe's population will be Muslim by 2030.  That might not seem much on a population of 750 million, but the fact is that these Muslims, on top of countless other Third World migrants, are primarily to be found in western Europe where they have huddled up in major European cities, transforming much of these once proud tourism pillars into Third World ghettos. All of this is only made possible by Bilderberg elites intimidating the native white masses with the promotion of slurs as "racist", "hater" and "Islamophobe" the second they criticize immigration policy
Keep in mind, this Third World immigration trend literally is never going to stop, because elites refuse to address the problem of below-two native birth rates and are always looking to grow the economy. In other words, native white Europeans are being PERMANENTLY replaced by a hotchpotch of Third World masses which even individually have never been able to put together a democratic, thriving society. As is almost the case with the United States, eventually whites in western Europe will become a minority, at least when the current trend continues
Looking at this problem and while finding ways to solve it, it might be fruitful to look at the beliefs of Muslims in the Middle East and how their beliefs change as they get here, mainly in relation to religion and support for Muslim terrorism.
Elsewhere ISGP has already focused on the vastly elevated crime numbers among Third World immigrant groups moving into Europe, including Muslims. In the Netherlands, for example, Turks are 5.5 times more likely to be in prison than native whites, Moroccans almost 8 times, with the more recent wave of North African Muslims seemingly on par with black groups as the Surinams (10 times) and Antilleans (21 times). Rape numbers for North African Muslims in Sweden stand roughly 23 times higher than whites. When gang rape is isolated, you're looking at 30 to 40 times more than native whites. Heart-warming, isn't it? And then you're not even talking about the largely completely out-of-control immigrant youths who don't listen at all to any corrections native white neighbors might suggest.
The following graphs come from a detailed 2009 study of World Public Opinion, a corroboration of experts of the Brookings Institution and universities as Columbia, Georgetown, Maryland and Northwestern.  The first graph represents Muslim support for attacks on U.S. troops in Iraq:
Almost just as many Muslims support attacks against troops stationed in the Persian Gulf on carrier groups and military bases:
It appears Muslims really don't like U.S. troops operating in the Persian Gulf. In fact, the vast majority of Muslims support the goal of Al Qaeda to force a withdrawal of all U.S. forces from Islamic countries:
Then again, as we shall see, vast amounts of Muslims support stoning persons convicted of adultery and putting to death people who try to leave Islam. Also, support for Osama bin Laden was very high in the Middle East, despite his attacks on innocent people, most notably 9/11:
True, one World Public Opinion poll reveals that "only" 10 to 20% of people in the Middle East - and thus roughly 160 to 320 million people - support Al Qaeda's attacks on Americans. However, that is probably related to the fact that Al Qaeda has a tendency to attack civilian targets which often kill innocent Muslims as well.
Now it is time for maybe the biggest surprise regarding Islamic culture: the amount of support for Sharia law. This is how the World Public Opinion study polled it:
We find roughly the same numbers in a more detailed study of the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, published in April 2013.  The numbers for Sharia Law support were determined to be as follows:
While the Pew Forum tries to make the case that most Muslims actually believe in democracy, want Sharia Law to apply to Muslims alone, and often only prefer the incorporation of basic Sharia family law, its own polls reveal a much more problematic reality: most Sharia supporters, a great majority of Arab citizens apart from Turkey and Lebanon, also support the stoning to death of adulterers and - reading a little between the lines - a death penalty for all religious minorities.
Below is a summary of the Pew Forum on the wishes of Sharia supporters in the Middle East and North Africa: a religious police (78%), corporal punishment (beatings, floggings, and the amputation of hands and feet) (57%), and the execution of nonbelievers (56%).
Here are some statistics about the beliefs of Muslims, mainly those living in the Middle East:
Clearly the vast majority of Muslims do not believe in women's rights, believe atheists and agnostics must have depraved or criminal minds; and can't deal at all with prostitution, homosexuality, sex before marriage, and even drinking alcohol. Surprisingly, only 50% think western pop culture hurts morality. Obviously a lot of Muslims can't deny that they at least enjoy a little bit of modern pop culture entertainment. The fact is that a television set with Western programming in many cases is the most fun and liberating thing Muslims have access to.
The Pew Forum actually is trying to make the situation sound better than it really is with their poll title "Widespread support for Democracy". Just 55% of people in the Middle East and North Africa, the most important group in European immigration, favor democracy over a "strong leader", i.e. a dictator. Hence, Muslims can't maintain democracies, something we have seen evidence of time and time again, even when democracy is handed to them on a golden platter: Lebanon, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Egypt, etc. Among western whites this poll would read well over 90%.
Here are some more statistics on beliefs of Muslims in the Middle East. They come from a 2016 study of UN Women, first published in May 2017.  The study polled Muslims in Egypt, Morocco, Lebanon and Palestine. As we've seen in earlier Pew polls, the Egyptians, of which an increasing number can be found in Italy, turned out to be among the most fanatical Muslims in the Middle East. On top of that, it also is a country where female genital mutilation is still widespread, a practice not to be found in the other countries sampled.
Here are the statistics from Morocco. Countries as Spain, France, Belgium and the Netherlands all have large Moroccan populations. While less data is available on Spain, in all these countries Muslim youths in particular are causing tons of mayhem. ISGP has discussed the situation with Moroccans in the Netherlands, where they have been making swimming pools unsafe for young white girls since the late 1980s.
Lebanon is slightly less radical than Morocco and certainly less than Egypt. Unfortunately not all the same statistics are available as with Egypt and Morocco:
Palestine is also not as bad as Egypt and Morocco, but it remains the furthest thing from compatible with western values. Also here not all the same statistics are available compared to the Egypt and Morocco, but the bizarre rape-marriage thing and female harassment numbers are a little lower than all other afore-listed countries, including Lebanon:
For those readers who missed it: this section is not about people living in the Middle East, but those that have migrated to the European Union. Essentially these numbers reflect how well or bad Muslims are integrating into western society.
A February 2006 poll found that 40% of Muslims living in Great Britain favored the introduction of Sharia law, with another 41% opposing it. That means 59% of British Muslims either want Sharia law introduced or are leaning at least a little bit towards it.
Luckily 99% of the Muslim population thought the 7/7 London bombings, which killed 52 citizens, were misguided, although 20% could sympathize with the feelings and motives of the bombers - 1 in every 5. One wonders to what extent Muslims were censoring their real opinions to poll makers, because "only just over half [of Muslims] thought the conviction of the cleric Abu Hamza for incitement to murder and race hatred was fair."  Hamza was a major supporter of Osama bin Laden, terrorism, and openly stated that "Allah likes those who believe in him who kill those who do not believe in him." Hamza is correct in the sense that this is what Muhammed preached. At the very least Muhammed stated that "infidels" can be murdered without consequence and that they'd all end up hell. As for Hamza, today he serves a life sentence in the U.S. for supporting terrorist activity. Apparently over half of the British Muslims should either join him or leave Great Britain to return to their country of origin.
In August 2006, another poll about British Muslims was released, revealing even more worrying numbers:
"Some answers are provided by the most comprehensive survey to date of Muslim opinion in Britain. The results from NOP Research, broadcast by Channel 4-TV on August 7, are startling. ...
"Almost one in four British Muslims believe that last year's 7/7 attacks on London were justified because of British support for the U.S.-led war on terror.
"When asked, "Is Britain my country or their country?" only one in four say it is. Thirty percent of British Muslims would prefer to live under sharia (Islamic religious) law than under British law. … Twenty-eight percent hope for the U.K. one day to become a fundamentalist Islamic state. This comports with last year's Daily Telegraph newspaper survey that found one-third of British Muslims believe that Western society is decadent and immoral and that Muslims should seek to end it.
"The news is no less alarming on the question of freedom of speech. Seventy-eight percent support punishment for the people who earlier this year published cartoons featuring the Prophet Mohammed. Sixty-eight percent support the arrest and prosecution of those British people who "insult Islam." When asked if free speech should be protected, even if it offends religious groups, 62 percent of British Muslims say No, it should not.
"Also concerning freedom of speech, as the NOP Research survey reports, "hardcore Islamists" constitute nine percent of the British Muslim population. A slightly more moderate group is composed of "staunch defenders of Islam." This second group comprises 29 percent of the British Muslim population. The scary reality is that only three percent of British Muslims "took a consistently pro-freedom of speech line on these questions."
"The British government believes that, in recent years, 3,000 British Muslims have returned home from al Qaeda training camps. 
Just before, in May 2006, the renowned Pew Research Carried carried out its Global Attitudes Project in which Muslims in the United States, Germany, Great Britain, Spain and France were polled. Respectively, 13%, 13%, 24%, 25% and 35% of the Muslim population in these countries thought that suicide bombings can be justified.
The (relatively) low U.S. number appears to be the result of the country only having a 1% Muslim population. This will rise to about 2% around 2050. This will cause an increase in the domestic terror threat, especially because Iranians, Pakistanis, Iraqis, Ethiopians, Syrians and Saudi Arabians are among the top Muslim immigrant groups into the country. The Turks are too, but these are less problematic.
Europe has much larger numbers than the United States, somewhere between 5% and 10% anno 2017. France, which has tried to keep the size of its Muslim population  and Muslim crime rates a secret , has the highest number. France also has huge numbers of North Africans as Algerians and Moroccans and Muslim blacks from North-West Sub-Sahara Africa, all notorious for their radicalism and very high crime numbers. This basically explains why 42% of the younger French Muslims support suicide attacks and why Paris has suffered major riots in recent years, all of which elite institutes and the mainstream media simply blamed on "racist policies" of the majority white population. 
Germany, in contrast to France, has huge numbers of Turks, the least radical and criminal of any Arab population. It's far from perfect, but they are not remotely as bad as the Moroccans, Pakistanis, Afghans and Somalians who came into the country after the 2011 fall of Gaddafi and the rise of ISIS in 2014 and started the so-called "Muslim rape crisis", something countries as the Netherlands, with its large number of Moroccans already was familiar with since the 1980s.
Spain has a large Algerian and Moroccan population, although not as sizable as France. Many North Africans and Sub-Saharan blacks in North-West Africa prefer France, southern Belgium or the French-speaking area of Switzerland due to the French language that was spread North-West Africa during the colonial era.
Britain has a large Pakistani population, which is more Jihadist than the Turks but not nearly as much as the North-Africans, such as the Moroccans. Pew polls featured earlier in this article demonstrate that pretty well.
In December 2013 a study was published that compared fundamentalist ideas among native Christians and Muslim immigrants in Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Germany and Austria.  Once again, the results were shocking. In north-western Europe, Christians are already known to be more conservative than average, but Muslims make them look like the most progressive liberals on the planet:
One wonders where this extreme tolerance of Islam in the liberal media and liberal elites comes from, because apart from economic growth there appears to be no reason for it. Certainly in the past there regularly was talk in the media about "the growing intolerance toward homosexuals and Jews" often with little to no mention of who is to blame.  That would be Muslim immigrants. Westerners really don't care about Jews. Even with all the criticism of the Israel lobby in the United States surrounding AIPAC, whites are not going to torch synagogues. Over time, it has become more common for news reports to include the culprits. Even former minister of defense and Bilderberg visitor Frits Bolkenstein did, complete with the advice to orthodox Jews to leave for the United States or Israel.  Some things never change. Liberal elites throwing the Jews under bus would be one of them. They did it before World War II. And now they're doing it again. One thing is certain: looking at average IQ numbers, it's not good for the knowledge economy.
After the rise of ISIS in 2014 a number of new polls emerged. A November 2014 study organized by Moroccan leaders in the Netherlands among 700 Moroccan and Turkish Muslims on the street apparently revealed that 49% of Dutch Moroccans between the ages of 18 and 34 support Hamas' terrorist struggle against Israel and that 39% either supports or doesn't oppose the violence used by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) against "disbelievers". This poll is very questionable, however, because it polled Turks - often at odds with the Moroccans - as supporting ISIS to the tune of 89%. This makes no sense considering the less radical nature of Turks and numbers from the homeland from that same period that revealed single digit numbers for ISIS support.
After tons of controversy, the Dutch government sponsored a study "revealing" that native white Dutch essentially were just as likely to support ISIS as Turks and only slightly less than Moroccans. In light of the numbers discussed earlier and still to be discussed, these Dutch studies absolutely make no sense, except maybe for the Moroccan numbers in the 2014 study.
Looking at Belgium, in September 2016 VTM Nieuws and Humo magazine polled 500 Moroccans and Turks between the ages of 15 and 55 over their support for ISIS, at a point that ISIS' brutal violence was well known: 20%, or 1 in 5, "sympathized" with ISIS, 16% wouldn't report a "radicalized" (i.e. Jihadist) youth to the authorities, 70% considers the Islam the only true belief, and 65% was of the opinion that Westerners are not tolerant enough of the Islam. Strangely, "only" 8%, or 1 in 12 or 13, thought it correct that Islamists use violence against infidels. How that 8% coincides with the 20% support for ISIS or with earlier-discussed 20 to 30% support for suicide bombings among French and Spanish Muslims, who are made up of a somewhat similar composition, is a good question. It appears indirect, passive support for violence against infidels is higher than active support. In this study it mainly were the older generation of Muslims who supported ISIS while in pretty much all other studies younger Muslims are found to be the most radical. 
In March 2017 a study was published in France by the National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) in which 7,000 14 to 16-year-old students were polled about their support for ISIS. These polls had mainly been conducted in 2016, after the November 2015 Paris Bombings. Of the Muslim youths polled, 32% considered Islam both the only true religion and more authoritative than science on how the world was created. 33% of Muslims considered violence for their religious ideas acceptable. 32% of all students polled showed full or a degree of sympathy for the Charlie Hebdo magazine attack by Algerian members of Al Qaeda in which basically the entire magazine staff was mowed down over the publication of a satirical depiction of the Prophet Muhammed. 21% of all students showed full or a degree of sympathy for the Bataclan Theater massacre by ISIS. For these last two numbers we have to keep in consideration that only 25% of those polled in this study were Muslim, indicating that the majority of French Muslim students - in modern times seemingly 25% of all French students  - at the very least show passive support of terrorist attacks on their non-Muslim French fellow-citizens.  This study has almost not been discussed out one or two major publications in France.
In April 2017 it was reported that almost half of the Mosques in Amsterdam, the capital of the Netherlands, were controlled by Salafists, the most extreme and terrorist branch of the Muslim faith, together with Wahhabism. Funding from Saudi Arabia, including scholarships for imams in Europe to come study in Saudi Arabia, was seen as the main cause. 
The conclusions seem obvious: Muslims are not the slightest bit compatible with western society. There literally is no reason to allow them to come here in more than very small numbers apart from dire economic reasons that need to be fixed in a sustainable manner in a very short period. Excluding the Turks and Balkan Muslims, roughly 1 in 4 (25%) to 1 in 3 (33%) of all Muslims do not oppose the practice of terrorist suicide attacks, with up to half of the Muslim population making excuses for fellow-Muslims who have committed terrorist acts against their own native white countrymen. In addition, 2 out of 3 (66%) think we in the West do not adapt to Muslim customs enough - despite the fact that they are our guests - and 7 out of 10 (70%) is of the opinion that the Koran represents the only "true faith". In all polls, French Muslims can be considered the most extremist, but as more and more Muslims are streaming into Europe and discontent continues to rise, other countries may soon see similar numbers.
All this begs the questions why elites in the West not at the very least are trying to up the native white birth rate to acceptable numbers. The present immigration policy is making the living situation in Europe, especially in and around the big cities, worse each and every year. Down the line it might well lead to civil war and a permanent balkanization of the continent. And we aren't even looking at the crime numbers, which make the problems ever bigger .
Under all circumstances it would be best to stick to the Turks, who are problematic but still considerably less religiously extreme than the rest of the Middle East, and also have considerably lower crime numbers than African blacks. For all the other Third World immigrants, everybody who builds up a criminal record should be send back to their country of origin, along with their immediate family. This should be the case for several generations, as second and third generations often are just as problematic.
The only conclusion left to draw is that the present immigration policy as implemented by the elites is beyond incompetent. And realistically, criminal, as they have implemented an active policy of hiding crime numbers and oppressing the native masses with white guilt psychological warfare tactics.
A November 2014 study organized by Moroccan leaders in the Netherlands among 700 Moroccan and Turkish Muslims on the street apparently revealed that 49% of Dutch Moroccans between the ages of 18 and 34 support Hamas' terrorist struggle against Israel and that 39% either supports or doesn't oppose the violence used by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) against "disbelievers". The most fanatic 18% considered the Dutch Muslims who joined ISIS "heroes". Those numbers immediately explain the phenomenon of Dutch Moroccan youths celebrating the September 11 attacks.  This report is a bit strange, however, because the religiously more moderate Turks all of a sudden supported ISIS to the tune of 89%. Even though Erdogan used ISIS as his tool to get rid of Assad and the vast majority of Dutch Turks are watching Turkish state television (so much for integration), these numbers simply cannot be accurate.  In September 2014 polls in Turkey revealed that only 1.3% of Turks responded to the question "Do you sympathize with IS [ISIS]?" with "yes", with 5% "undecided". 59% of respondents stated they believed ISIS posed a threat to Turkey.  So how is it possible that Dutch Turks did overwhelmingly support ISIS? Something is very suspect here.
The study caused major political and media consternation - it was discussed everywhere - and was followed up in 2015 by another study, this time by a government agency, the Netherlands Institute for Social Research. And lo and behold, now the needle swung to the other opposite extreme: virtually all traces of Muslim extremism among Turks and even Moroccans disappeared as snow before the sun. In fact, in this study native Dutch youths are roughly as pro-terrorist as Turkish and sometimes even Moroccan youths. Native Dutch women even are more pro-ISIS than Turkish women. For example, page 8, table 3 shows the results to the statement:
|"I have a little or a lot of understanding for youths traveling from the Netherlands for ISIS ... to fight...."|
Total support for this statement reads: Turkish: 8%, Moroccans: 10%, native Dutch: 8%. For women only: Turkish: 6%, Moroccans: 9%, native Dutch: 8%. And for women above 45: Turkish: 5%, Moroccans: 7%, native Dutch: 8%. What?! In what universe do these numbers make sense? The questions are also ambiguous and open to interpretation, especially for open-minded people. I too can "understand" that brainwashed Muslims want to go fight for their caliphate in the Middle East. But I do not "support" it. So that is the statement the researchers should have posed: "I support the struggle and methods of ISIS." The second statement of the study also is very ambiguous:
|"I have a little or a lot of understanding for people who use violence for their faith."|
All of a sudden the Turks and Moroccans scored considerably higher with this statement than the native Dutch, respectively 10%, 7% and 2%. The numbers were not listed by both male and young (15 to 24-years-old) and one can understand why, because the numbers would rise to about 20% for this group. It's fascinating how the mainstream media glanced over this fact: "But also among youths an overwhelming majority of certainly 80 percent has no sympathy with IS [ISIS] and religiously-inspired violence."  In other words: one in five Muslim youths in the Netherlands supporting ISIS is nothing to worry about.
The again, even in that case the Dutch mysteriously ended up at 10%. Isn't that strange? Or maybe it isn't. One wonders how different these numbers would look with the statement: "I support the brutal tactics of ISIS, including public torture and slow beheadings of infidels, or at the very least think they are necessary." Yes or no. Followed by the statement: "I would love to join ISIS." Yes or no. Those are questions we can do something with.
Apart from this, the numbers might be skewed, because third generation immigrations might be listed as "native". The third generation doesn't fall into the Dutch definition of "immigrant" anymore (one parent needs to have been born in a foreign country). Whites may also have looked at this question as possibly defending their faith or culture from the Muslim invasion going on these days. Lastly, as the Netherlands Institute for Social Research itself admits, quite a few Dutch Muslim youths don't understand why the Muslims of ISIS have been attacking the Syrian "pro-government" Muslims, suspect the conflict is a U.S.-Israel plot and have been pointing fingers at fake news as Jews posing as ISIS collaborators with Stars of David underneath their garb. The study does make it very clear that the vast majority of Muslim youths primarily identify themselves as being Muslim while not feeling they are part of the Netherlands at all.
There has never been a proper explanation how it is possible that these two studies on Muslim beliefs in the Netherlands differ so completely from each other in numbers. Both appear to be the result of manipulation, the former primarily against Turks and the latter just overall. In any case it is absolutely scandalous that no proper studies on ISIS / Muslim terrorism support among Muslims in the Netherlands exists - or that at the very least not an attempt has been made to explain why an official government study on this subject has such incredibly deviating numbers compared to other international studies on the subject.